Table 3.
Effect of Planning on Total Gym Visits
| Dependent Variable: Number of Visits During 2-Week Intervention Period | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
| Planning treatment indicator | −0.30 | −0.26 | −0.16 | −0.11 |
| (0.21) | (0.16) | (0.17) | (0.13) | |
| Control variables | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Number of observations | 877 | 877 | 1,186 ^ | 1,186 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Mean of dependent variable for control group | 2.62 | 2.62 | 2.36 | 2.36 |
p<0.01
p<0.05
p<0.1. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are in parentheses. Each column represents a separate regression. Columns 1 and 2 are for subjects who submitted the survey. Columns 3 and 4 include additional subjects who received an email with the survey embedded, but did not submit it. Control variables include the number of days subject visited the gym in the two week pre-intervention period and indicator variables for age, age missing, gender, university affiliation, student, and membership type.