Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2018 Sep 20;62:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.09.002

Table 3.

Effect of Planning on Total Gym Visits

Dependent Variable: Number of Visits During 2-Week Intervention Period

Independent Variable (1) (2) (3) (4)
Planning treatment indicator −0.30 −0.26 −0.16 −0.11
(0.21) (0.16) (0.17) (0.13)
Control variables No Yes No Yes
Number of observations 877 877 1,186 ^ 1,186
Adjusted R-squared 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.42
Mean of dependent variable for control group 2.62 2.62 2.36 2.36
***

p<0.01

**

p<0.05

*

p<0.1. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are in parentheses. Each column represents a separate regression. Columns 1 and 2 are for subjects who submitted the survey. Columns 3 and 4 include additional subjects who received an email with the survey embedded, but did not submit it. Control variables include the number of days subject visited the gym in the two week pre-intervention period and indicator variables for age, age missing, gender, university affiliation, student, and membership type.