Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;17(1):133–145. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1766334

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Antiviral efficacy of FluLaval 2016–2017 in the young and aged cotton rats when given as a two-times (a) vs. one-time (b) immunization. (a) Two-times vaccination. Young and aged cotton rats were immunized with the indicated doses of FluLaval (FluL) 2016–2017 and boosted 3 weeks later. After another 3 weeks animals were infected i.n. with influenza A/California (A/Cal) at 107 TCID50 per 100 g animal and sacrificed one day later for analysis of viral load in the lung and nose. Results of viral titration by TCID50 assay (VT) are shown. Control animals were infected i.n. with A/Cal and re-infected 6 weeks later (°2) or mock immunized and infected with A/Cal (°1). (b) One-time vaccination. Young and aged cotton rats were immunized with FluLaval once, infected i.n. with A/Cal 3 weeks later, and sacrificed 1 day after infection. Control animals were mock-immunized with PBS and infected i.n. with A/Cal once (°1) or twice with an interval of 3 weeks (°2) and sacrificed one day after challenge. Unimmunized and uninfected animals were included as additional controls (“-“). Results represent GMT±SE for 5–6 animals per group. *p < .05 when compared to primary infection of the same age animals, #p < .05 when compared to the same treatment, opposite age