Table 4.
Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Analysis
| Step | Activity | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Sorting | Sort the findings from each data source under the final classification framework to determine where there maybe overlap or divergence, presence, frequency and meaning. | Interview transcripts with participants, carers, facilitators and supervisors |
| 2. Convergence coding | Identify key themes from each data source using coded examples to determine prominence and compare findings. Then compare a sample of coded examples with co-researcher interpretations from the perspective of people living with dementia. | Interview transcripts with participants, carers, facilitators and supervisors. Co-researcher workshop selected quotation. |
| 3. Convergence agreement | Identify where there is agreement, divergent or ambivalent themes and interpretations between the two coding researchers and the researchers and co-researchers (people living with dementia). | Initial and modified analysis frameworks. Co-researcher workshop selected quotation. |
| 4. Convergence assessment | Identify global assessment for level of agreement between multiple researchers (including the co-researchers) as well as acknowledging different perspectives. | Final classification framework. |
| 5. Completeness | How results of the global assessment enhance the completeness of the overall findings and answer the research question. | Final classification framework. |