Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e26433. doi: 10.2196/26433

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 3484 recorded video consultations. Missing answers (ranging from 0-9 general practitioners per question) are not displayed.

Characteristics of the video consultations (N=3484) Values, n (%)
General practitioner’s pre-existing knowledge of the patient

Very good 1788 (51.3)

Good 972 (27.9)

Some 448 (12.9)

None 276 (7.9)
Main reason for contact

New problem 1560 (44.8)

Follow-up 1921 (55.1)
Total number of contact reasons discussed

1 1471 (42.2)

2-4 1930 (55.4)

>4 75 (2.2)
Suitability of video consultation compared to a face-to-face consultation for the same reason

Better or same 1766 (50.7)

Worse 1709 (49.1)
Suitability of video consultation to assess the severity of the main reason for contact compared to a face-to-face consultation

Better or same 1767 (50.7)

Worse 1709 (49.1)
Loss from not being able to examine the patient physically

No loss 1359 (39.0)

Some loss 1232 (35.4)

Major loss 884 (25.4)
Concern about not picking up signs of serious illness

Not worried 2009 (57.7)

Neutral 953 (27.3)

Worried 514 (15.0)
General practitioner’s perception of patient satisfaction with video consultation

Very satisfactory 988 (28.4)

Satisfactory 1979 (56.8)

Unsatisfactory 368 (10.6)

Do not know 140 (4.0)
General practitioner’s satisfaction with technology (connection, sound, image)

Very satisfactory 1433 (41.1)

Satisfactory 1685 (48.4)

Unsatisfactory 273 (7.8)

Video consultation terminated due to technical problems 84 (2.4)
Motivation to conduct a video consultation for a similar health problem (reason for contact) in a nonpandemic future

Yes 1704 (48.9)

Do not know 768 (22.0)

No 1003 (28.8)