Table 2.
The mean comparison of the putrescine and Ca nanoparticle (CaNP) effect on saffron reproductive characters
Traits | Source of variation | Degrees of freedom | Sum of squares | Mean square | F-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chlorophyll a | Putrescine | 4 | 0.059 | 0.015** | 5.22 |
CaNP | 4 | 0.058 | 0.014** | 5.13 | |
Putrescine × CaNP | 16 | 1.163 | 0.01** | 3.61 | |
Error | 50 | 0.1410 | 0.003 | 0.003 | |
Chlorophyll b | Putrescine | 4 | 0.0208 | 0.052** | 4.47 |
CaNP | 4 | 0.0253 | 0.06** | 5.43 | |
Putrescine × CaNP | 16 | 0.558 | 0.035** | 3.003 | |
Error | 50 | 0.58 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
Total chlorophyll | Putrescine | 4 | 0.472 | 0.118** | 4.95 |
CaNP | 4 | 0.542 | 0.13** | 5.69 | |
Putrescine × CaNP | 16 | 1.264 | 0.079** | 3.32 | |
Error | 50 | 1.18 | 0.024 | 0.024 | |
Carotenoid | Putrescine | 4 | 0.015 | 0.004** | 6.15 |
CaNP | 4 | 0.024 | 0.006** | 10.19 | |
Putrescine × CaNP | 16 | 0.059 | 0.004** | 6.20 | |
Error | 50 | 0.029 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
*, **Significant effect and ns shows no significance effect at probability level of 5% and 1%