Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;11:3386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83116-0

Table 3.

Resting state pairwise connections in individuals with food addiction compared to individuals with no food addiction.

Food addiction versus no food addiction
Network Analysis unit Network Analysis unit df t p-value q-value Interpretation
Brainstem 113 connections
Bst L MRF CEN L_MFG (R_ContB_PFClv_3) 146 4.05 8.28E−05 0.02 Greater
Bst L_MRF CAN R_OrG, (R_ContB_PFClv_2) 146 3.98 1.08E−04 0.02 Greater
Bst L_MRF CAN L_OrG, (L_ContB_PFClv_1) 146 3.89 1.52E−04 0.02 Greater
Emotional regulation (ERN) network connections
ERN L_InfFS, (R_ContA_PFCl_2) SMN R_PosCG, (R_SomMotA_16) 146 − 4.00 1.00E−04 0.04 Lower
Sensorimotor (SMN) network connections
SMN R_PosCG, (R_SomMotA_16) DMN R_MTG, (R_TempPar_6) 146 − 4.11 6.57E−05 0.03 Lower

Summarizes significant disease-related differences in functional connectivity (individuals with food addiction vs. individuals with no food addiction). All connections are significant q < 0.05.

Bst, Brainstem; CAN, Central Autonomic Network; CEN, Central Executive Network; DMN, Default Mode Network; ERN, Emotional Regulation Network; InfFS, Inferior frontal sulcus; MFG, Middle frontal gyrus; MRF, Mesencephalic reticular formation; MTG, Middle Temporal Gyrus; OrG, Orbital gyri; PosCG, Postcentral Gyrus; SMN, Sensorimotor Network.

df: degrees of freedom; p value significant < .05, q value (corrected for multiple comparisons) < .05.