Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 15;13:100339. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100339

Table 4.

CAST characteristics of current users; use frequency and gender differences (n = 7,549).

Frequency of past year cannabis use, current users only Valid cases CAST
a. Scale score b. Clinical-range
n (%) M (SD) %
Entire sample 7,549 (100.0%) 1.40 (2.66) 5.96%
Less frequent use (≤50 times) 6,857 (90.8%) 0.86 (1.74)*** 1.87%
More frequent use (>50 times) 692 (9.2%) 6.8 (3.86)*** 46.53%
Men 3,481 (100%) 1.83 (3.05) 8.45%
Less frequent use (≤50 times) 3,016 (86.6%) 1.05 (1.95)*** 2.42%
More frequent use (>50 times) 465 (13.4%) 6.95 (3.83)*** 47.53%
Women 4,022 (100%) 1.02 (2.17) 3.75%
Less frequent use (≤50 times) 3,802 (94.5%) 0.71 (1.54)*** 1.39%
More frequent use (>50 times) 220 (5.5%) 6.48 (3.73)*** 44.55%

Note:

* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Even though a total of 7,575 participants reported past year cannabis-use, only 7,549 completed CAST.

Shown are the unadjusted estimates; average CAST scores and the proportion of respondents scoring within DSM-5 clinical range for use disorder among past-year cannabis users for the two examined use frequency categories.

Noted are significant differences across past-year use frequency categories obtained from: a) t-tests for CAST continuous scale scores; t(7,547) = −73.3, p < .001 for all users; t(3,479) = −51.7, p < .001 for men, and t(4,020) = −47.9, p < .001, for women, and b) Chi-square tests for the distribution of DSM-5 clinical cases, exact Χ2 (1) = 2,200, p < .001 for all users; exact Χ2 (1) = 1,100, p < .001 for men, and exact Χ2 (1) = 1,100, p < .001 for women.

Overall, men had both significantly greater average CAST scores (MMen = 1.83 ± 3.05 vs. MWomen = 1.02 ± 2.17; t(7,501) = −13.3, p < .001) and greater odds of use disorder (8.45% vs. 3.75%, OR = 2.36, CI 95% = 1.93–2.89, p < .001).