Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;10:606368. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.606368

Table 1.

Daratumumab.

Treatment Clinical trials Patient population ORR% PFS OS at 12 m Date of approval
D monotherapy GEN501 RRMM 36* 5.6 m 77%* Nov 16, 2015
SIRIUS RRMM 29.2 3.7 m 64.8%
POLLUX RRMM 92.9
vs 76.4
12 m:
83.2 vs 60.1%
92.1 vs 86.8% Nov 21, 2016
D-Rd vs Rd
MAIA NDMM transplant-ineligible 92.9
vs 81.3
30 m:
70.6 vs 55.6%
June 27, 2019
D-Vd vs Vd CASTOR RRMM 82.9 vs 63.2 12 m:
60.7 vs 26.9 %
Nov 21, 2016
D plus PomDex EQUULEUS RRMM 60 13.1 m: 8.8 m (median) 66%
(median)
June 16, 2017
D-VMP vs VMP ALCYONE NDMM transplant-ineligible 90.9
vs 73.9
18 m:
71,6 vs 50.2%
May 7, 2018
D-VTd vs VTd CASSIOPEIA NDMM transplant-eligible 92.6
vs 89.9
18 m:
93 vs 85%
Sept 26, 2019
D-RVd vs RVd GRIFFIN NDMM transplant-eligible 99 vs 91.8 24 m:
95.8 vs 89.9 %

*in the cohort of patients receiving 16 mg/kg dose.

NDMM, newly diagnosed MM patients; RRMM, relapsed refractory MM patients; D, daratumumab; R, lenalidomide; Pom, pomalidomide; V, bortezomib; M, melphalan; T, thalidomide; P, prednisone; d, dexamethasone; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression free survival; OS, overall survival; m, months.