Table 3.
Performance comparison of different methods for identifying ccRCC.
Identification method | Sample number | Sens (%) | Spec (%) | AUC | ACC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This work | 306 | 94.56 | 90.97 | 0.9372 | 97.28 | |
Gene expression profiling (8) | 295 | 98.10 | NA | NA | 95.70 | |
Serum lncRNA signature (11) | 51 | 79.20 | 88.90 | 0.9000 | 84.10 | |
Serum histidine and plasma tryptophan (12) | 242 | 84.70 | 85.50 | 0.9160 | 85.12 | |
Multiphasic multidetector CT (7) | Discrimination of ccRCC from | |||||
oncocytoma | 108 | 86.00 | 43.00 | NA | 77.00 | |
papillary RCC | 119 | 94.00 | 62.00 | NA | 85.00 | |
chromophobe RCC | 97 | 92.00 | 25.00 | NA | 84.00 |