Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;10:605769. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.605769

Table 3.

Performance comparison of different methods for identifying ccRCC.

Identification method Sample number Sens (%) Spec (%) AUC ACC
This work 306 94.56 90.97 0.9372 97.28
Gene expression profiling (8) 295 98.10 NA NA 95.70
Serum lncRNA signature (11) 51 79.20 88.90 0.9000 84.10
Serum histidine and plasma tryptophan (12) 242 84.70 85.50 0.9160 85.12
Multiphasic multidetector CT (7) Discrimination of ccRCC from
oncocytoma 108 86.00 43.00 NA 77.00
papillary RCC 119 94.00 62.00 NA 85.00
chromophobe RCC 97 92.00 25.00 NA 84.00