Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 25;11:609524. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.609524

Table 5.

Multiple regression model in VitD deficient and VitD non-deficient patients.

  25 (OH)D-FF Bioavailable 25 (OH)D-FF Free 25 (OH)D-FF
VitD metabolite OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
1.15 1.02–1.30 0.017 7.57 2.21–25.96 0.001 0.0 0.0–0.0 0.009
BMI 1.01 0.92–1.12 0.705 1.01 0.92–1.12 0.797 0.98 0.89–1.08 0.695
Age 0.93 0.87–1.00 0.063 0.93 0.87–1.00 0.095 1.06 0.99–1.14 0.067
AMH 1.01 0.83–1.23 0.865 1.01 0.83–1.23 0.947 0.99 0.81–1.21 0.924
Status VitD 33.36 3.7–300.76 0.002 50.34 6.94–364.96 < 0.001 0.02 0.002–0.203 < 0.001
VitD metabolite-status VitD 0.84 0.75–0.95 0.009 0.10 0.03–0.36 < 0.001 NE NE -NE < 0.001

Reference group is VitD non-deficient, modelling for a euploid embryo.

Results are expressed as OR, Odds Ratio; 95% CI, confidence interval and p values.

BMI, body mass index; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.

Status VitD: VitD status of the patient, VitD non-deficient compared to VitD deficient.

VitD metabolite-status VitD: Interaction between each VitD metabolite 25(OH)-D-FF, bioavailable 25(OH)-D-FF and free 25(OH)-D-FF and the status of the patient (VitD non-deficient as a reference).