Skip to main content
. 2018 May 18;13:155–162. doi: 10.1515/biol-2018-0021

Table 1.

Objective analyses comparing SMAR and 40% ASiR

ΔCT AI

ROI1 ROI2 ROI3 ROI4 ROI1 ROI2 ROI3 ROI4
40% ASiR 119.68±25.27 71.57± 57.52 71.51 32.29± 28.12± 27.89± 23.61±
images 12.16 ±6.98 ±13.38 3.91 3.28 4.72 3.08
SMAR images 19.72±5.34 19.96± 12.87± 19.83± 15.07± 14.26± 10.99± 9.67±
3.55 3.03 3.39 2.07 1.69 1.03 0.89
t 3.87 4.07 5.87 3.74 3.89 3.75 3.5 4.35
P <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
ΔCT AI
ROI1 ROI2 ROI3 ROI4 ROI1 ROI2 ROI3 ROI4
40% ASiR 119.68±25.27 71.57± 57.52 71.51 32.29± 28.12± 27.89± 23.61±
images 12.16 ±6.98 ±13.38 3.91 3.28 4.72 3.08
SMAR images 19.72±5.34 19.96± 12.87± 19.83± 15.07± 14.26± 10.99± 9.67±
3.55 3.03 3.39 2.07 1.69 1.03 0.89
t 3.87 4.07 5.87 3.74 3.89 3.75 3.5 4.35
P <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
ΔCT AI
ROI1 ROI2 ROI3 ROI4 ROI1 ROI2 ROI3 ROI4
40% ASiR 119.68±25.27 71.57± 57.52 71.51 32.29± 28.12± 27.89± 23.61±
images 12.16 ±6.98 ±13.38 3.91 3.28 4.72 3.08
SMAR images 19.72±5.34 19.96± 12.87± 19.83± 15.07± 14.26± 10.99± 9.67±
3.55 3.03 3.39 2.07 1.69 1.03 0.89
t 3.87 4.07 5.87 3.74 3.89 3.75 3.5 4.35
P <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05