Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;7:602894. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.602894

Table 2A.

NRS scores by group for pain pre- and post-HUT and after 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days.

Group 1
HC
Group 2
ME/CFS FM-
Group 3
with ME/CFS FM+
Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test
NRS for pain pre-HUT 0 (0–1) 3 (1–5) 5 (3–6) X2(2) = 68.75; p < 0.0001. Post hoc tests: 1 vs. 2 p < 0.0001; 1 vs. 3 p < 0.0001 and 2 vs. 3 p < 0.0001
NRS for pain post-HUT 0 (0–1) 4 (2–6) 6 (4–8) X2(2) = 79.39; p < 0.0001. Post hoc tests: 1 vs. 2 p < 0.0001; 1 vs. 3 p < 0.0001 and 2 vs. 3 p < 0.0001
NRS for pain 24 h 0 (0–1) 6 (3–7) 7 (6–8) X2(2) = 85.23; p < 0.0001. Post hoc tests: 1 vs. 2 p < 0.0001; 1 vs. 3 p < 0.0001 and 2 vs. 3 p < 0.0001
NRS for pain 48 h 0 (0–1) 5 (3–7) 7 (5.8–8) X2(2) = 90.55; p < 0.0001. Post hoc tests: 1 vs. 2 p < 0.0001; 1 vs. 3 p < 0.0001 and 2 vs. 3 p < 0.0001
NRS for pain 7 days 0 (0–1) 5 (3–7) 7 (5–8) X2(2) = 81.04; p < 0.0001. Post hoc tests: 1 vs. 2 p < 0.0001; 1 vs. 3 p < 0.0001 and 2 vs. 3 p < 0.0001

FM, fibromyalgia; HC, healthy controls; HUT, head-up tilt test; NRS, numeric rating scale. With equal skews a mixed two-way ANOVA could be performed analyzing both patient groups (without FM and with FM) and all five in subject variables (pre-HUT, post-HUT, after 24 h, after 48 h and after 7 days) on pain: F (4, 1375)= 0.21; p = 0.93.