Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;8(2):ofaa608. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa608

Table 1.

Babesiosis Cases and Rates Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries, by Sex, Age, and Race, During 2006–2017

Number of Babesiosis Cases (Babesiosis Rate per 100 000 Beneficiary-Yearsa)
Sex and Age All Years 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
All Beneficiaries
 All Ages (65+)b,c 19 469 (6) 995 (4) 853 (3) 1225 (5) 1500 (6) 1317 (5) 1374 (5) 1226 (5) 1889 (7) 1823 (7) 2521 (10) 2303 (9) 2443 (9)
 65–74 11 162 (7) 537 (4) 436 (4) 678 (6) 833 (7) 739 (6) 759 (6) 720 (6) 1093 (9) 1063 (8) 1537 (11) 1353 (10) 1414 (10)
 75–84 6370 (6) 353 (3) 319 (3) 424 (4) 512 (6) 447 (5) 478 (5) 384 (4) 621 (7) 591 (7) 756 (9) 682 (8) 803 (9)
 ≥85 1937 (4) 105 (2) 98 (2) 123 (3) 155 (3) 131 (3) 137 (3) 122 (3) 175 (4) 169 (4) 228 (5) 268 (6) 226 (5)
Femalesd
 All Ages (65+)b,c 10 117 (6) 513 (3) 444 (3) 649 (4) 815 (6) 695 (5) 718 (5) 655 (4) 959 (6) 930 (6) 1317 (9) 1174 (8) 1248 (8)
 65–74 5967 (7) 284 (4) 242 (4) 365 (6) 459 (7) 410 (6) 428 (7) 405 (6) 571 (8) 549 (8) 819 (11) 708 (10) 727 (10)
 75–84 3110 (5) 173 (3) 154 (3) 215 (4) 262 (5) 210 (4) 230 (4) 180 (4) 296 (6) 310 (6) 365 (8) 322 (7) 393 (8)
 ≥85 1040 (3) 56 (2) 48 (2) 69 (2) 94 (3) 75 (2) 60 (2) 70 (2) 92 (3) 71 (2) 133 (5) 144 (5) 128 (5)
Malesd
 All Ages (65+)b,c 9352 (7) 482 (4) 409 (4) 576 (5) 685 (6) 622 (6) 656 (6) 571 (5) 930 (8) 893 (8) 1204 (10) 1129 (10) 1195 (10)
 65–74 5195 (7) 253 (4) 194 (3) 313 (6) 374 (7) 329 (6) 331 (6) 315 (5) 522 (9) 514 (8) 718 (11) 645 (10) 687 (10)
 75–84 3260 (7) 180 (4) 165 (4) 209 (5) 250 (7) 237 (6) 248 (7) 204 (5) 325 (9) 281 (7) 391 (11) 360 (10) 410 (11)
 ≥85 897 (5) 49 (4) 50 (4) 54 (4) 61 (4) 56 (4) 77 (5) 52 (3) 83 (5) 98 (6) 95 (6) 124 (8) 98 (7)
Racee
 Nonwhiteb 973 (2) 22 (1) 29 (1) 47 (1) 62 (2) 51 (2) 48 (1) 43 (1) 72 (2) 99 (3) 141 (4) 165 (4) 194 (5)
 Whiteb 18 496 (7) 973 (4) 824 (4) 1178 (5) 1438 (6) 1266 (6) 1326 (6) 1183 (5) 1817 (8) 1724 (8) 2380 (11) 2138 (9) 2249 (10)

aBabesiosis rates are rounded to the nearest whole number.

bThe trend of babesiosis occurrence rates during 2006–2017 is statistically significant according to the Cochran-Armitage test for trend, using a significance level of P < .05.

cFor “All Years”, significantly declining babesiosis rates (P < .05) with advancing age, by age categories, according to the Cochran-Armitage test for trend: overall and by sex, correspondingly.

dRate comparison of males vs females, resulted in relative risk (RR) = 1.24 and 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21–1.28.

eRate comparison of white vs nonwhite, resulted in RR = 2.98 and 95% CI = 2.79–3.18.