Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;17(1):e1008550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008550

Table 4. Comparison of active module detection methods with CTD.

Method Network Structure Biological Data Network Propagation Used? Optimization/Subgraph Search Performed? Module Assigned Significance? Permutation testing?
CTD Gaussian graphical models Functional -omics YES YES YES NO
CePa Pathway Knowledgebases Gene expression NO NO YES YES
DEGraph Pathway Knowledgebases Gene expression NO YES YES NO
HotNet/HotNet2 Interaction Knowledgebases Somatic mutation YES YES YES YES
MATISSE Interaction Knowledgebases Gene expression NO YES NO NO
Multi-Dendrix Interaction Knowledgebases Somatic mutation NO YES YES YES
NetWalk Interaction Knowledgebases Gene expression, RNAi screen YES NO NO* N/A
PARADIGM Pathway Knowledgebases Copy number, Gene expression, Proteomics YES NO YES YES
PRS Pathway Knowledgebases Gene expression NO NO YES YES
SPIA Pathway Knowledgebases Gene expression NO NO YES YES

* Edge probabilities are computed as Edge Flux scores. The authors state that statistical procedures on this distribution can be applied, but do not offer module significance inherently.