Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0245589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245589

Fig 9. Comparison of clustering results obtained using conventional and proposed mechanism employing DBSCAN with dataset 1 and Wavelet features.

Fig 9

(a) Clustering results using conventional spike sorting method applied on complete dataset containing 3405 Spikes. (b) Performance indication of clustering results based on computational time/speed and clustering accuracy. (c)-(f) Clustering results using proposed spike sorting mechanism applied on data-subdivision of optimal length i.e 1135 for DBSCAN. (g) Unification of subdivided cluster subsets. (h) Performance indication of clustering results using proposed spike sorting method.