Table 5.
Categorical traits | Response | Males |
Females |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genotype |
Adjusted |
p-value | Genotype |
Adjusted |
||||||
GG | GA + AA | OR (95% CI) | p-value | (corrected) | GG | GA + AA | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Eating pattern | Random | 19 (82.6%) | 106 (55.5%) | 0.25 (0.08, 0.77) | 0.016 | 0.048a | 13 (52.0%) | 89 (59.7%) | 1.16 (0.48, 2.79) | 0.742 |
Specific | 4 (17.4%) | 85 (44.5%) | 12 (48.0%) | 60 (40.3%) | ||||||
Diet unconsciousness | Yes | 18 (18.3%) | 145 (75.9%) | 0.88 (0.31, 2.51) | 0.807 | 0.807 | 15 (60.0%) | 103 (69.1%) | 1.44 (0.59, 3.52) | 0.420 |
No | 5 (21.7%) | 46 (24.1%) | 10 (40.0%) | 46 (30.9%) | ||||||
TFDF | High | 10 (43.5%) | 66 (34.6%) | 0.69 (0.27, 1.71) | 0.418 | 0.627 | 7 (28.0%) | 32 (21.5%) | 0.48 (0.17, 1.33) | 0.159 |
Mod–Low | 13 (56.5%) | 125 (65.4%) | 18 (72.0%) | 117 (78.5%) |
Categorical traits were assessed using logistic regression using dominant model. Parameters were adjusted for both age and BMI.
An adjusted and corrected p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Mod–Low: moderate to low; TFDF: tendency towards fat-dense food.