Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;133(3):107–117. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01610-3

Table 4.

Mixed linear model to evaluate the impact of the function of the donated kidney on recipient eGFR

Parameters Reduced modela Multivariable modelb
Estimate (95% CI) P value Estimate (95% CI) P value
Impact on recipient baseline eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2
eGFR-dkc, per mL/min/1.73 m2 Changes with each calculation 0.6 (0.1 to 1.1) 0.02
Recipient variables
Age, per year −0.2 (−0.5 to 0) 0.06 −0.2 (−0.4 to 0.1) 0.23
Female sex, yes vs. no 3.5 (−4.7 to 11.7) 0.40
Preemptive transplantation, yes vs. no 1.9 (−6.4 to 10.3) 0.65
Recipient of a re-transplant, yes vs. no 4.7 (−8 to 17.3) 0.46
ABO/HLA incompatible transplantation, yes vs. no 1.3 (−11.2 to 13.9) 0.83 -
Sum of HLA mismatch in A, B and DR, per n −0.9 (−3.5 to 1.8) 0.52
IL-2R antibody induction, yes vs. no −7.5 (−20.5 to 5.5) 0.26
Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no 2.6 (−7.5 to 12.6) 0.61
Belatacept-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no −0.3 (−15.8 to 15.3) 0.97
LD variables
Age, per year −0.5 (−0.9 to 0) 0.04 −0.4 (−0.9 to 0) 0.08
Female sex, yes vs. no −6.4 (−14.5 to 1.8) 0.12 −3.8 (−12.0 to 4.3) 0.35
BMI, per kg/m2 0.8 (−0.2 to 1.8) 0.133 0.6 (−0.4–1.6) 0.24
Living-related, yes vs. no −2.5 (−10.3 to 5.4) 0.53
Abnormal MTT of donated kidneyd, yes vs. no −6.8 (−14.4 to 0.9) 0.08 −6.2 (−13.5 to 1.2) 0.10
Biopsy-proven rejection
TCMR, yes vs. no 0.1 (−9.5 to 9.7) 0.99 −2.0 (−11.3 to 7.2) 0.66
ABMR, yes vs. no 0.5 (−11.9 to 12.8) 0.94 1.6 (−10.1 to 133) 0.79
Impact on recipient eGFR slope, mL/min/1.73 m2/year
eGFR-dkc, per mL/min/1.73 m2 Changes with each calculation −0.1 (−0.3 to 0.1) 0.27
Recipient variables
Age, per year 0.1 (0 to 0.2) 0.26 0 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.39
Female sex, yes vs. no −2.1 (−5.2 to 1.1) 0.20
Preemptive transplantation, yes vs. no 1.1 (−2.1 to 4.4) 0.49
Recipient of a re-transplant, yes vs. no 0.9 (−4.2 to 6) 0.73
ABO/HLA incompatible transplantation, yes vs. no −0.5 (−5.4 to 4.4) 0.85
Sum of HLA mismatch in A, B and DR, per n 0.3 (−0.8 to 1.3) 0.59
IL-2R antibody induction, yes vs. no 1.4 (−3.5 to 6.3) 0.58
Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no 2.5 (−1.4 to 6.4) 0.20
Belatacept-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no −0.9 (−6.7 to 4.9) 0.77
LD variables
Age, per year −0.2 (−0.3 to 0) 0.09 −0.2 (−0.4 to 0) 0.07
Female sex, yes vs. no 2.5 (−0.6 to 5.7) 0.11 0.9 (−2.4 to 4.1) 0.60
BMI, per kg/m2 −0.4 (−0.8 to −0.01) 0.03 −0.5 (−0.8 to −0) 0.04
Living-related, yes vs. no −0.2 (−3.3 to 2.8) 0.87
Abnormal MTT of donated kidneyd, yes vs. no 0.6 (−2.4 to 3.6) 0.71 0.9 (−2.1 to 3.8) 0.56
Biopsy-proven rejection
TCMR, yes vs. no −2.8 (−6.5 to 0.9) 0.13 −1.2 (−4.9 to 2.5) 0.51
ABMR, yes vs. no −5.3 (−10 to −0.6) 0.03 −5.8 (−10.4 to −1.2) 0.01

ABMR antibody-mediated rejection, BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR-dk eGFR of the donated kidney, IL-2R interleukin‑2 receptor, LD live donor, MTT mean transit time, TCMR T cell-mediated rejection

aIn the reduced model recipient eGFR values from 6 to 36 months were used as dependent variable. eGFR-dk and time were included in each calculation. Other variables were added one by one. Slope estimates additionally considered interactions of variables with time

bThe multivariable model included eGFR-dk and time. Additionally, the model was expanded by variables with a P value of <0.157 for their impact on recipient baseline eGFR or its slope in the reduced model

ceGFR-dk was calculated from total donor eGFR on the basis of the relative kidney function determined in isotope nephrography

dMTT values of 1.9 to 2.9 min were considered normal