Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;133(3):107–117. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01610-3

Table 5.

Mixed linear model to evaluate the impact of total LD kidney function on recipient eGFR

Parameters Reduced modela Multivariable modelb
Estimate (95% CI) P value Estimate (95% CI) P value
Impact on recipient baseline eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2
eGFR-dt, per mL/min/1.73 m2 Changes with each calculation 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.5) 0.14
Recipient variables
Age, per year −0.3 (−0.5 to 0) 0.04 −0.2 (−0.4 to 0.1) 0.20
Female sex, yes vs. no 4.8 (−3.4 to 13.1) 0.25
Preemptive transplantation, yes vs. no 1.9 (−6.5 to 10.4) 0.65
Recipient of a re-transplant, yes vs. no 6.4 (−6.4 to 19.1) 0.32
ABO/HLA incompatible transplantation, yes vs. no 0.2 (−12.5 to 13) 0.97
Sum of HLA mismatch in A, B and DR, per n −0.7 (−3.4 to 2) 0.60
IL-2R antibody induction, yes vs. no −7 (−20.2 to 6.2) 0.29
Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no 1.3 (−8.9 to 11.5) 0.80
Belatacept-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no −0.1 (−15.8 to 15.7) 0.99
LD variables
Age, per year −0.6 (−1.1 to −0.1) 0.02 −0.5 (−1 to 0) 0.05
Female sex, yes vs. no −7.1 (−15.3 to 1.1) 0.09 −4.6 (−12.8 to 3.7) 0.28
BMI, per kg/m2 0.72 (−0.3 to 1.7) 0.16 0.5 (−0.5 to 1.5) 0.30
Living-related, yes vs. no −3.2 (−11.2 to 4.7) 0.42
Abnormal MTT of donated kidneyc, yes vs. no −8.3 (−16 to −0.5) 0.04 −6.6 (−14.2 to 0.9) 0.08
Biopsy-proven rejection
TCMR, yes vs. no 1.4 (−8.4 to 11.3) 0.77 −1.3 (−10.7 to 8.1) 0.78
ABMR, yes vs. no 0.8 (−11.9 to 13.5) 0.90 1.4 (−10.6 to 13.4) 0.81
Impact on recipient eGFR slope, mL/min/1.73m2/year
eGFR-dt, per mL/min/1.73 m2 Changes with each calculation 0 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.52
Recipient variables
Age, per year 0.1 (0 to 0.2) 0.21 0 (−0.1 to 0.1) 0.20
Female sex, yes vs. no −2.2 (−5.3 to 1) 0.17
Preemptive transplantation, yes vs. no 1.3 (−2 to 4.5) 0.44
Recipient of a re-transplant, yes vs. no 0.5 (−4.6 to 5.6) 0.84
ABO/HLA incompatible transplantation, yes vs. no −0.5 (−5.5 to 4.4) 0.84
Sum of HLA mismatch in A, B and DR, per n 0.3 (−0.8 to 1.3) 0.60
IL-2R antibody induction, yes vs. no 1.1 (−3.8 to 6.1) 0.65
Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no 2.6 (−1.3 to 6.5) 0.19
Belatacept-based immunosuppression, yes vs. no −1 (−6.8 to 4.8) 0.74
LD variables
Age, per year −0.1 (−0.3 to 0.1) 0.18 −0.2 (−0.4 to 0) 0.11
Female sex, yes vs. no 2.7 (−0.4 to 5.9) 0.09 1.0 (−2.2 to 4.3) 0.53
BMI, per kg/m2 −0.4 (−0.8 to 0) 0.03 −0.4 (−0.8 to 0) 0.05
Living-related, yes vs. no −0.3 (−3.3 to 2.8) 0.87
Abnormal MTT of donated kidneyc, yes vs. no 0.6 (−2.4 to 3.6) 0.70 1.0 (−2.0 to 4.0) 0.53
Biopsy-proven rejection
TCMR, yes vs. no −2.7 (−6.5 to 1) 0.15 −1.4 (−5.1 to 2.4) 0.47
ABMR, yes vs. no −5.1 (−9.8 to −0.3) 0.04 −5.7 (−10.4 to −1.0) 0.02

ABMR antibody-mediated rejection, BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR-dt total donor eGFR, IL-2R interleukin‑2 receptor, LD live donor, MTT mean transit time, TCMR T cell-mediated rejection

aIn the reduced model recipient eGFR values from 6 to 36 months were used as dependent variable. eGFR-dt and time were included in each calculation. Other variables were added one by one. Slope estimates additionally considered interactions of variables with time

bThe multivariable model included eGFR-dt and time. Additionally, the model was expanded by variables with a P value of <0.157 for their impact on recipient baseline eGFR or its slope in the reduced model

cMTT values of 1.9–2.9 min were considered normal