Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 12;31(2):221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02763-7

Table 2.

Median and percentiles for each variable considered stratified by side of the limb and gender of the patient

Panel A: right limb (n = 38)
Male (n = 20)
Median (2.5%; 97.5%)
Female (n = 18)
Median (2.5%; 97.5%)
p value
FA 10.9 (− 3.0; 25.0) 22.6 (5.0; 36.6) 0.003
PCA 2.8 (− 0.5; 4.5) 3.3 (1.0; 6.2) 0.044
TEA-PTC 0.1 (− 6.7; 9.2) 2.4 (− 2.2; 7.0) 0.260
TEA-PTT − 1.2 (− 4.5; 2.8) − 1.7 (− 10.9; 3.3) 0.578
TEA-TFA 29.6 (19.1; 41.2) 33.0 (15.0; 43.8) 0.465
PTC-TFA 28.6 (17.1; 44.1) 30.2 (16.3; 43.0) 0.619
AMA 4.8 (2.8; 6.6) 6 (3.9; 6.6) 0.009
FI 124.8 (119.0; 132.2) 125.8 (120.9; 132.9) 0.265
Panel B: left limb (n = 37)
Male (n = 19)
Median (2.5%; 97.5%)
Female (n = 18)
Median (2.5%; 97.5%)
p value
FA 19 (1.3; 28.1) 20.5 (9.3; 33.0) 0.194
PCA 3 (− 1.5; 5.7) 3 (0.0; 5.3) 0.532
TEA-PTC 1 (− 6.4; 7.6) 1.46 (− 5.4; 5.7) 0.483
TEA-PTT − 1 (− 4.9; 3.1) − 2.1 (− 10.3; 4.6) 0.438
TEA-TFA 30.1 (10.0; 39.7) 31.0 (12.4; 46.8) 0.395
PTC-TFA 26.2 (12.0; 44.0) 29.2 (12.9; 43.5) 0.236
AMA 4.6 (3.1; 6.0) 5.8 (2.9; 6.6) 0.012
FI 125.1 (120.8; 132.6) 125.7 (122.9; 134.6) 0.446

The p values refer to the significance of a rank Wilcoxon statistics for independent samples

FA femoral anteversion, PCA posterior condylar angle, TEA-PTC angle between transepicondylar surgical axis and tangent to the posterior prominent point of the medial and lateral tibial condyles, TEA-PTT angle between transepicondylar surgical axis and tangent to the posterior surface of the tibia at TT sections, TEA-TFA angle between transepicondylar surgical axis and line joining the center of both malleoli, AMA anatomical–mechanical angle of femur, FI femoral inclination