Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Feb 10;16:27. doi: 10.1186/s11671-021-03475-5

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s) 2021

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 5 — hucMSC-Exos attenuate pathological characteristics of PE rats. a Results of SBP in rats after exosome treatment. b Results of 24-h proteinuria in rats after exosome treatment. c Weight changes of fetal rats after exosome treatment. d Changes of placental weight in rats after exosome treatment. e Changes of inflammation factors after exosome treatment in serum were determined using ELISA. n = 10, *p < 0.05 versus the normal group. ^#p < 0.05 versus the PE group. ^$p < 0.05 versus the PE + Exos-antagomir NC group. Measurement data were depicted as mean ± standard deviation, and comparisons among multiple groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test