Table 5.
Equation No. | n | Equation3) | RMSE | R2 | Intercept4) | Slope5) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||
Value | p-value | Value | p-value | |||||
18 | 232 | DE = 965+0.72×GE−66.40×ADF | 187 | 0.61 | −13 (28) | 0.646 | −0.70 (0.11) | <0.001 |
19 | 262 | ME = 0.98×DE−4.22×CP | 55 | 1.00 | 31 (4) | <0.001 | 0.06 (0.02) | 0.011 |
20 | 228 | ME = 1,521+0.56×GE−65.30×ADF | 184 | 0.59 | 21 (29) | 0.470 | −0.71 (0.11) | <0.001 |
21 | 185 | ME = 3,847+38.69×EE−67.24×ADF | 181 | 0.57 | 41 (30) | 0.174 | −0.77 (0.11) | <0.001 |
22 | 185 | ME = 3,741+5.75×CP+39.84×EE−68.86×ADF | 179 | 0.58 | 63 (29) | 0.041 | −0.76 (0.10) | <0.001 |
RMSE, root mean square of error; DE, digestible energy; GE, gross energy; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ME, metabolizable energy; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract.
Thirty two in vivo data points were employed to validate prediction equations for energy concentrations in feed ingredients.
Values in parentheses are standard error.
Energy concentrations and chemical composition are expressed as kcal/kg dry matter and % dry matter, respectively.
The intercept represents the mean bias.
The slope represents the linear bias.