Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;13:43. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00778-8

Table 2.

Rate ratios for relationships between WMS-R LM IIA—Delayed Recall score and ACE-I vs. ARB use over time (n = 1689)

Overall APOE ε4 non-carriers APOE ε4 carriers
RR [95% CI] z p value RR [95% CI] z p value RR [95% CI] z p value
ARBs vs. ACE-Is 1.094 [1.007, 1.188] 2.14 0.0327 1.200 [1.064, 1.354] 2.97 0.0030 1.003 [0.897, 1.122] 0.06 0.9568
C-ARBs vs. NC-ACE-Is 1.250 [1.089, 1.434] 3.16 0.0015 1.354 [1.116, 1.642] 3.08 0.0020 1.130 [0.932, 1.371] 1.25 0.2124
C-ACE-Is vs. NC-ACE-Is 1.158 [1.036, 1.293] 2.57 0.0098 1.168 [0.995, 1.385] 1.90 0.0571 1.140 [0.976, 1.331] 1.65 0.0993
NC-ARBs vs. NC-ACE-Is 1.199 [1.055, 1.365] 2.79 0.0054 1.324 [1.108, 1.583] 3.07 0.0021 1.104 [0.923, 1.321] 1.08 0.2785
C-ARBs vs. NC-ARBs 1.042 [0.921, 1.179] 0.65 0.5175 1.022 [0.865, 1.208] 0.26 0.7947 1.024 [0.869, 1.205] 0.28 0.7802
C-ARBs vs. C-ACE-Is 1.080 [0.965, 1.209] 1.34 0.1798 1.159 [0.985, 1.364] 1.78 0.0746 0.992 [0.854, 1.152] − 0.11 0.9161

Three-way APOE × ARB vs. ACE-I × Time interaction: RR = 1.196 [1.015, 1.410], z = 2.135, p = 0.0328

C-ARB: BBB-crossing ARB; C-ACE-I: BBB-crossing ACE-I; NC-ARB: Non-BBB-crossing ARB; NC-ACE-I: Non-BBB-crossing ACE-I