Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;21:45. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01255-3

Table 1.

The use of PCIA

Secondary Outcomes Group S
(n = 20)
Group O
(n = 30)
Group QO
(n = 30)
p
People of use bolus in PACU n(%) 0.001
Yes 14(82.4) 23(76.7) 9(30)a,b
No 3(17.6) 7(23.3) 21(70)a,b
Opioid consumption in PCA after operation Median (IQR), ug or mg
0-2nd h 3.0(2.1,5.0) 3.0(2.7,4.8) 2.7(1.0,3.0)a,b 0.051
2nd-6th h 6.0(4.0,8.0) 5.7(2.0,7.5) 3.6(2.0,4.1)a,b 0.002
6th–12th h 7.0(4.8,10.6) 6.8(3.8,10.8) 5.1(3.0,6.1)a,b 0.007
12th–24th h 12.0(8.5,15.5) 9.8(7.7,14.1) 9.4(6.0,11.4) 0.072
24th–48th h 16.0(14.0,21.5) 14.5(12.0,16.1) 14.0(12.0,15.4)a 0.006
48th–72th h 14.5(14.0,17.8) 15.1(12.0,15.6) 13.9(12.0,16.0) 0.134
Total 52.2(60.3,73.5) 53.5(48.5,70.0) 48.5(43.9,54.2)a,b 0.002
Postoperative length of stay Median (IQR), d 8.0 (6.3,9.0) 7.0 (5.0,9.0) 7.0 (5.8,8.3) 0.376

Continuous variables were presented as median (IQR). Kruskal-Wallis test for inter-group comparisons and Bonferroni method for pairwise comparison. Qualitative variables were expressed as number of patients (percentage). The data were analyzed using Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. a:p < 0.05 compared with Group S; b:p < 0.05 compared with Group O

PCIA Patient controlled intravenous analgesia

PACU Postanesthesia care unit