Table 1.
Means and standard deviations (SD) or percentage, at post-institute, of contextual therapist, supervisor/manager, and setting measures used in the generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses
| Level | Mean ± SD | Observed range | Possible range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | |||
| Measure | |||
| Therapist | |||
| Attitudes | |||
| EST attitudes | 48.7 ± 6.2 | 29–60 | 0–60 |
| BBI attitudes | 59.8 ± 14.3 | 15.5–85 | −90 - +90 |
| Intent to use BBI | 31.4 ± 4.9 | 19–40 | 0–40 |
| Self-Efficacy | |||
| General self-efficacy | 198.4 ± 18.4 | 125–225 | 0–225 |
| BBI self-efficacy | 63.5 ± 6.1 | 40–72 | 0–72 |
| Confidence in conducting BBI | 26.2 ± 3.2 | 18–30 | 6–30 |
| Knowledge | 83.7% ± 8.7 | 56.3–100 | 0–100% |
| Manager/supervisor | |||
| Attitudes | |||
| EST attitudes | 42.5 ± 5.6 | 30–54 | 0–56 |
| Setting | |||
| Community (vs. non) | 55% (n=74) | ||
| Resource availability | |||
| Rooms available (% yes) | 69% (n=92) | ||
| Able to promote BBI (% yes) | 58% (n=77) | ||
| Challenges/benefits ratio | 69.5 ± 19.3 | 2–100 | 0–100 |
| Sustainment across assessments (# of sites) | 74.0 ± 5.6 | 66–79 | 0–110 |
EST empirically supported treatment; BBI biobehavioral intervention.