Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 3;11(1):21–33. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz178

Table 2.

Theory of change for Casarett evidence-based intervention (EBI)

Component of theory of change Results
Primary causal pathway • “Don’t lead the conversation by mentioning the “h” word [hospice], end the conversation by talking about hospice as a solution to self-identified needs”*: Reframing of the conversation from one about death and hospice to be about patient’s needs, goals, and preferences. For patients who “screened positive,” hospice was presented as a solution to the patient’s specific needs, goals, and preferences that they had expressed during the screening.
Secondary causal pathway • “It allows for the potential to identify people who need hospice sooner…by…having these conversations about care goals, preferences, and needs without there being a precipitating event”*: Integrating the reframed conversation into usual care via standardized patient eligibility criteria for having the conversation and standardized timing of the conversation lessens the tendency to wait for a precipitating event (e.g., decline in clinical status and change in prognosis) to identify someone as needing hospice, improving timeliness of referrals to hospice.

*Quote from semistructured interviews.