Table 2. Methodological quality of observational studies included in the meta-analysis1.
First author | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the unexposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Outcome of interest not present at the start of the study | Control for important factor or additional factor | Outcome assessment | Follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of the follow-up of cohorts | Total quality scores |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meissner/2003 [12] | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 |
Hu/2012 [13] | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 |
Wang/2017 [14] | ☆ | — | ☆ | — | — | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 5 |
Fukutomi/2018 [15] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 7 |
Herrera/2018 [16] | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 7 |
Thornton/2019 [17] | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | — | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 |
1 A study could be awarded a maximum of one star for each item except for the item Control for important factor or additional factor.