Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246345

Table 1. Memory of position and polarity axis in Dictyostelium mutants and other species.

Strain Memory Position Memory Polarity-axis Effect of memory
alternating left-right (%LR) pseudopods in front (%F) Persistent steps (# pseudopods)
Dictyostelium
Starved WT 77±4 86±6 14.9±1.0
Vegetative WT 74±2 ns 55±7 * 5.7±1.6 *
Starved sgc/gca-null 72±5 ns 41±6 * 9.1±1.9 *
Starved gbpC-null 75±4 ns 51±7 * 9.7±1.1 *
Starved myoII-null 73±3 ns 64±7 * 5.2±1.9 *
Starved forAEH-null and racE-null 75±4 ns 33±3 * 5.7±2.2 *
Starved Rap1G12V 76±3 ns 32±4 * nd
Starved SCAR-SD 56±5 * 84±5 ns 8.6±1.0 *
Vegetative SCAR-SD 56±3 * 55±3 * 1.4±0.4 *, **
Neutrophils 74±5 ns 87±2 ns 13.2±1.6 ns
Mesenchymal stem cells 79±5 ns 86±3 ns 16.0±2.6 ns
B.d. chytrid 78±2 ns 89±4 ns 14.7±0.6 ns
Expected if no memory 50 to 60% 30 to 40% 1
(see S3 Fig) (size of front; Fig 1E)

Data for memory of position and memory of polarity axis are the means and SEM; n = 28 cells for starved wild-type (WT), and n = 8 cells for others. Data for effect of memory are the optimal fit and 95% CI from S4 Fig and S1 Table. ns, not significant at P>0.05

*, significantly different from starved WT at P<0.01

**, significantly different from starved SCAR-SD at P<0.01; nd, not determined because cells do not displace.