Table 1—

Adjusted Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals from Logistic Regression for Inclusion of Other SHA Members in Social Network at 6-Month Follow-Up (N = 234)

Independent Variables	P Value	Odds Ratio	95% CI
Other SHA members in network @ baseline (control)	.0002 ***	3.21	(1.75, 5.90)
Demographics
Ethnicity African Amer. (1.0) vs. Other (0)	.0375 *	.47	(.23, .95)
Gender Female (1.00) vs. Male (0)	.1836	1.59	(.80, 3.17)
Housing Status Homeless (1.00) vs. Housed (0)	.6974	1.14	(.59, 2.21)
Psychological
Symptom Severity (BPRS)	.8414	.99	(.97, 1.03)
Dual Diagnosis (1.00) vs. Other (0)	.1844	1.52	(.82, 2.84)
Personal Empowerment	.8370	1.00	(.97, 1.04)
Self-esteem	.0477 *	1.07	(1.00, 1.14)
Hopefulness	.3067	.92	(.79, 1.08)
Attitudes Toward Psychiatric Disabilities (Social Distance)	.4601	.96	(.86, 1.07)
Organizational
Organizational Empowerment	.0180 *	1.11	(1.02, 1.20)
Relative Importance of Autonomy	.0348 *	.81	(.67, .98)
Relative Importance of Non-Judgmental Agency Environment	.0097 **	1.39	(1.08, 1.79)
Relative Importance of Concrete Agency Services	.0056 **	.64	(.47, .88)

^*p < .05;

^**p < .01;

^***p < .001

Model χ² = 50.078, df = 14, p < .00005.

N.B. See Tabachnick & Fidell (1996) for discussion of odds ratios.