Table 2.

Navigation and tasks checklist and respective peer review test results.

Checklist item		Evaluation
		Ta1	T2	T3	T4	T5	Mean (SD)	Median
1	The app has no irrelevant, unnecessary, or distracting information	4	4	4	4	3	3.8 (0.45)	4
2	Excessive text, animations, or images have been avoided	4	3	4	4	4	3.8 (0.45)	4
3	The user does not need to use memory to scroll through the app	4	3	4	4	4	3.8 (0.45)	4
4	The main path is clear, avoiding distractions	4	3	4	4	3	3.6 (0.55)	4
5	The information is presented in a simple and natural way	4	4	2	3	3	3.2 (0.84)	3
6	The number of screens per task has been minimized	4	4	3	3	4	3.6 (0.55)	4
7	The app requires minimal scrolling and clicks	3	3	4	3	3	3.2 (0.45)	3
8	The app correctly anticipates the user's next intentions	3	3	4	3	2	3.0 (0.71)	3
9	The use of metaphors is understandable	3	3	4	3	3	3.2 (0.45)	3
10	If there is an image or icon alongside a button, it is relevant for the task	3	4	3	4	4	3.6 (0.55)	4
11	Commands and actions are presented as buttons or gestures, not as hyperlinks	4	3	4	3	4	3.6 (0.55)	4
12	A new user can use the most common functions without assistance	3	4	4	3	4	3.6 (0.55)	4
13	There is a convenient and obvious way to go through the different screens of the app	4	4	3	3	4	3.6 (0.55)	4
14	The most relevant information is easily accessible	2	4	3	3	4	3.2 (0.84)	3
15	Navigation is organized in the most logical way and oriented to the app’s tasks	4	4	4	3	2	3.4 (0.89)	4
16	The structure of the app is simple and without unnecessary levels	4	4	4	3	4	3.8 (0.45)	4
17	The main sections of the app are available from any screen and there are no dead ends	3	2	4	2	2	2.6 (0.89)	2
18	Navigation feedback is appropriate	3	3	4	3	3	3.2 (0.45)	3
19	The app has its own consistent graphic terminology and conventions between the different screens	3	4	2	3	3	3.0 (0.71)	3
20	Only navigation screens (such as the homepage) can be viewed without scrolling	3	4	2	4	4	3.4 (0.89)	4
21	The app allows the user to browse at their own pace	3	4	4	4	4	3.8 (0.45)	4

^aT: Test.