Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 12;25(3):1423–1431. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03450-x

Table 1.

List of relevant information for all retainers investigated: manufacturer, product name, material composition, and manufacturing process. CAD/CAM computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing

Manufacturer Product name Material composition of retainer alloy (%) Manufacturing process
1 Ormco (Orange, CA, USA) “Respond” archwire Stainless-steel alloy 304 (carbon: 0.08; chromium: 10.8/20.0; nickel: 8/10.5; magnesium: 2.0; silicon: 1.00; rest: iron) Bending
2 Ortholize (Nienhagen, Germany) No specific product name Cobalt-chromium alloy (cobalt: 60; chromium: 28; wolfram: 9; silicon 1.5; magnesium, nitrogen, niobium, iron: all < 1) CAD/CAM (laser melting)
3 Fachlabor Klee (Frankfurt, Germany) “3D Swiss Retainer” Grade-5 titanium (aluminum: 5.5; vanadium: 3.5; iron, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen: all < 1; rest: titanium) CAD/CAM (milling)
4 CA Digital (Hilden, Germany) “Memotain” Nitinol (nickel: 55; titanium: 45; oxygen, nitrogen, carbon: all < 1) CAD/CAM (laser cutting)