Table 1.
Imaging technique | Strengths | Limits |
---|---|---|
Plain radiograph |
Diffuse availability Low costs Assessment of potential pathological fractures |
Low sensitivity Incapacity of detecting soft tissue involvement |
CT |
High resolution and three-dimensional information Lesion characterization Assessment of cortical integrity Guidance for bone biopsy |
Intermediate sensitivity |
MRI |
High sensitivity Assessment of soft tissue and neural structures involvement Possibility of employment of functional techniques (DWI, DCE) |
High costs Longer scan times Contraindicated in presence of implantable devices |
131I scintigraphy |
High sensitivity for RAI-avid lesions Whole body assessment Theranostic value |
Limited spatial resolution (improved by SPECT/CT) Limited value in case of non RAI-avid lesions |
Bone scintigraphy | Whole body assessment |
Limited spatial resolution (improved by SPECT/CT) Limited accuracy in detecting lytic lesions |
18F-FDG PET/CT |
Whole body assessment High sensitivity in non-RAI-avid lesions Prognostic value |
Lower sensitivity than 131I scintigraphy for RAI-avid lesions Lower anatomical assessment accuracy than high-resolution CT |
18F-NaF PET/CT |
Whole body assessment Higher sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting osteoblastic lesions |
Lower sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating bone marrow involvement and early bone lesions Low availability Low clinical experience |
CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, DCE dynamic contrast enhanced, 131I 131iodine, RAI radioactive iodine, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography, PET positron emission tomography, 18F–FDG 18fluorine–fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F–NaF 18fluorine–sodium fluoride