Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;44(3):403–419. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01374-7

Table 1.

Strengths and limits of the main imaging modalities used for the detection of BM in DTC patients

Imaging technique Strengths Limits
Plain radiograph

Diffuse availability

Low costs

Assessment of potential pathological fractures

Low sensitivity

Incapacity of detecting soft tissue involvement

CT

High resolution and three-dimensional information

Lesion characterization

Assessment of cortical integrity

Guidance for bone biopsy

Intermediate sensitivity
MRI

High sensitivity

Assessment of soft tissue and neural structures involvement

Possibility of employment of functional techniques (DWI, DCE)

High costs

Longer scan times

Contraindicated in presence of implantable devices

131I scintigraphy

High sensitivity for RAI-avid lesions

Whole body assessment

Theranostic value

Limited spatial resolution (improved by SPECT/CT)

Limited value in case of non RAI-avid lesions

Bone scintigraphy Whole body assessment

Limited spatial resolution (improved by SPECT/CT)

Limited accuracy in detecting lytic lesions

18F-FDG PET/CT

Whole body assessment

High sensitivity in non-RAI-avid lesions

Prognostic value

Lower sensitivity than 131I scintigraphy for RAI-avid lesions

Lower anatomical assessment accuracy than high-resolution CT

18F-NaF PET/CT

Whole body assessment

Higher sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting osteoblastic lesions

Lower sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating bone marrow involvement and early bone lesions

Low availability

Low clinical experience

CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, DCE dynamic contrast enhanced, 131I 131iodine, RAI radioactive iodine, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography, PET positron emission tomography, 18F–FDG 18fluorine–fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F–NaF 18fluorine–sodium fluoride