Table 5.

Evaluation of PVS-PREDIAPS discrete implementation strategies as cataloged by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy

Strategies in italics were those identified a priori to be used as part of implementation plan (X) Implementation strategy identified as useful for own professional development (+) Implementation strategy considered valuable for the optimization process (B) Implementation strategy needed to foster competence building (E) Implementation strategy needed to facilitate engagement of professionals (C) Implementation strategy needed for inter-professional collaboration (−) Implementation strategy identified as needing improvement
	Global group				Sequential group
PREDIAPS-ERIC Strategies	PC1 A	PC2 Zu	PC3 Iz	PC4 P	PC5 Er	PC6 Sv	PC7 Eg	PC Za	PC So
Pre-planned ERIC Strategies
5. Audit and provide feedback	+		X -		B	X +		X	+
12. Change record systems
14. Conduct cyclical small tests of change	X +	+
15. Conduct educational meetings	X +	X -	X +	X -	X	X ++ −	X +	X	X - B
17. Conduct local consensus discussions
18. Conduct local needs assessment			X					X	X
19. Conduct on-going training
23. Develop a formal implementation blueprint
27. Develop and organize quality monitoring systems
48. Organize clinician implementation team meetings
51. Promote adaptability								+
55. On-going support for implementation
57. Recruit, designate, train for leadership	E							C
59. Revise professional roles	C
Additional ERIC Strategies Perceived
20. Create a learning collaborative		X	+	XX +	X		+	X	X +
33. Facilitation	X	+		+		X +
44. Mandate change	E	E			B