Table 5:
Exposure Window | Quality of evidence rating1 | Direction of effect estimates | Confidence in effect estimates | Other compelling attributes | Strength of evidence rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM2.5 | |||||
1st Trimester | Very low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
2nd Trimester | Low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
3rd Trimester | Low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
Full Pregnancy | Low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
PM10 | |||||
1st Trimester | Low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
2nd Trimester | Low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
3rd Trimester | Moderate | Adverse2 | Limited4 | None | Limited |
Full Pregnancy | Moderate | Adverse2 | Limited4 | None | Limited |
PM2.5–10 | |||||
1st Trimester | Very low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
2nd Trimester | Very low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
3rd Trimester | Very low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
Full Pregnancy | Low | Adverse2 | Low3 | None | Inadequate |
From Table 4.
Decreasing birth weight with increasing exposure is considered an effect in the adverse direction.
Results may be due to chance, bias, or confounding, so additional data are likely to alter the results.
A credible association is observed, but chance, bias, and confounding cannot be ruled out with reasonable confidence, so additional data could alter the results.