Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Law Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;44(4):327–335. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000416

Table 2.

Traditional ANOVA and GLM Models of Pause Duration in Seconds by Age in Years and Experimental Condition

Main effects only
ANOVA model (categorical age) GLM model (continuous age)
Summary table Summary table
Predictor SS df MS F p ηp2 [95% CI] SS df MS F p ηp2 [95% CI]
Age 123.75 4 30.94 1.59 .184 .06 [.00, .14] 138.98 1 138.98 7.41 .008 .07 [.01, .18]
Condition 44.57 1 44.57 2.86 .134 .02 [.00, .11] 48.51 1 48.51 2.59 .111 .03 [.00, .11]
Error 1852.83 95 19.50 1837.59 98 18.75
Parameter estimates
b [95% CI] SE t p
Intercept 6.73 [5.52, 7.94] 0.60 11.07 < .001
Age 1.02 [0.28, 1.76] 0.37 2.72 .008
Condition 1.39 [−0.32, 3.10] 0.86 1.61 .111
Main effects with interaction
ANOVA model (categorical age) GLM model (continuous age)
Summary table Summary table
Predictor SS df MS F p ηp2 [95% CI] SS df MS F p ηp2 [95% CI]
Age 122.82 4 30.70 1.54 .197 .06 [.00, .14] 138.79 1 138.79 7.33 .008 .07 [.01, .18]
Condition 51.69 1 51.69 2.59 .111 .03 [.00, .12] 47.60 1 47.60 2.51 .116 .03 [.00, .11]
Interaction 38.94 4 9.74 0.49 .744 .02 [.00, .06] 1.21 1 1.21 0.06 .801 < .01 [.00, .04]
Error 1813.88 91 19.93 1836.38 97 18.93
Parameter estimates
b [95% CI] SE t p
Intercept 6.74 [0.91, 7.47] 0.61 11.01 < .001
Age 0.92 [−0.14, 1.98] 0.53 1.73 .087
Condition 1.38 [−0.35, 3.10] 0.87 1.59 .116
Interaction 0.19 [−1.30, 1.68] 0.75 0.25 .801

Note. F tests for model effects are based on Type III SS for all models. Age was centered by subtracting the mean age from all ages to facilitate interpretation. Condition is coded 0 = control, 1 = experimental.