Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;52(6):283–299. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1782460

Table 4.

Influenza vaccination studies examining transmission within households.

Reference (SIGN) Design Population N Mean age (range)* in years Season Outcome description Outcome
Direction effect (−, −/+, +)
Measure Outcome 95% CI/ p-value
Antimicrobial use of household contacts of vaccinated children
 Esposito (++) [17] RCT Parents 254 36.8/38.1 2000–2001 Antimicrobial prescriptions VE 27% .01 +
    Siblings 95 5.3/5.0 2000–2001 Antimicrobial prescriptions VE 33% .01 +
 Hurwitz (+) [24] RCT Household contacts 29 0–4 1996–1997 Antimicrobial prescriptions VE NR   −/+
      59 5–17 1996–1997 Antimicrobial prescriptions VE 88% .02 +
      140 ≥18 1996–1997 Antimicrobial prescriptions VE NR   −/+
Vaccination of household contacts and antimicrobial use in infants
 Maltezou (++) [21] Non-randomized Mother–infant 530 30.5 (15–46)/ 30.9 (15–45) 2012–2013 Antimicrobial administration Difference** 45.4% .014 +
          2012–2013 Antimicrobial administration OR*** 0.472 0.911–0.245/.025 +
    Other household contacts 1291* NR 2012–2013 Antimicrobial administration NR   NS −/+

* Overall, there were 1844 members in the 553 studied households, including 553 mothers, 525 fathers, 358 siblings, 323 grandparents, 73 other relatives, and 12 caregivers; ** Number of antimicrobial administrations (95% CI) in infants of vaccinated mothers: 22 (4.9–11.6) versus infants of unvaccinated mothers: 40 (10.8–19.5);*** The odds ratio is presented here has been calculated in conventional format as the risk in post-partum vaccinated mothers, rather than the original format which presented the risk in those unvaccinated; CI confidence interval; NR: not reported; NS: not significant; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SIGN: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; VE: vaccine effectiveness.