Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;52(6):283–299. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1782460

Table 7.

Influenza plus pneumococcal vaccination studies examining antimicrobial use.

Reference (SIGN) Design Population N Median Age (range) Season Vaccine Outcome description Outcome
Direction effect (−, −/+, +)
Measure Outcome 95% CI/ p-value
Jansen (++) [20] RCT Children 579* 3.0 yrs (18–72 mo) 2003–2005 TIV + PCV7 Antimicrobial prescriptions during influenza season IRR 0.73 0.40 to 1.32 −/+
      148 3.1 yrs (18–72 mo) 2003–2005 TIV + placebo Antimicrobial prescriptions during influenza season IRR 0.89 0.50 to 1.61 −/+
Mahamat (−) [33] Non-randomized Elderly 68,897 75.2 yrs (65–102 mo) Oct–Dec 2004 TIV + PPV23, TIV, PPV23 or none Antimicrobial consumption Difference** NS −/+

*N = 163,148 and 160 in TIV/PCV7, TIV + Placebo and Placebo-only groups respectively; **Not quantifiable, data presented in figures; CI: confidence interval; IRR: incidence rate ratio; mo: months; NS: not significant; PCV7: heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PPV23: 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SIGN: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; TIV: trivalent influenza vaccine; yrs: years.