Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;4(5):bjgpopen20X101112. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101112

Table 4. All GPs' views on clusters and quality.

Strongly disagree, n (%) Disagree, n (%) Neutral, n (%) Agree, n (%) Strongly agree, n (%)
I feel informed about what my cluster is trying to achieve(n = 2450) 195 (8.0) 463 (18.9) 553 (22.6) 1021 (41.7) 218 (8.9)
Decisions made by my GP cluster reflects my views(n = 2447) 147 (6.0) 420 (17.2) 1055 (43.1) 694 (28.4) 131 (5.4)
My practice quality lead is responsive to queries and/or concerns (n = 2406) 51 (2.1) 107 (4.4) 843 (35.0) 1063 (44.2) 342 (14.2)
Our GP cluster is owned by its members and feels like our organisation (n = 2439) 184 (7.5) 432 (17.7) 1040 (42.6) 615 (25.2) 168 (6.9)
I can influence the work of my GP cluster if I choose to (n = 2440) 153 (6.3) 362 (14.8) 884 (36.2) 853 (35.0) 188 (7.7)
How GP clusters have affected: Decreased a lot, n (%) Decreased a little, n (%) Not changed, n (%) Increased a little, n (%) Increased a lot, n (%)
Your understanding of quality planning (how to set quality improvement goals) (n = 2432) 82 (3.4) 128 (5.3) 1636 (67.3) 530 (21.8) 56 (2.3)
Your understanding of quality improvement (methods and approaches) (n = 2430) 73 (3.0) 127 (5.2) 1645 (67.7) 527 (21.7) 58 (2.4)
Your understanding of quality control (measuring improvement, ensuring safety) (n = 2430) 75 (3.1) 116 (4.8) 1726 (71.0) 473 (19.5) 40 (1.6)
Your understanding of the characteristics of the local population of patients (n = 2431) 56 (2.3) 75 (3.1) 1674 (68.9) 556 (22.9) 70 (2.9)
The quality of care that you provide (n = 2431) 38 (1.6) 91 (3.7) 1836 (75.5) 440 (18.1) 26 (1.1)
The extent to which you involve patients in decisions about their care (n = 2425) 37 (1.5) 76 (3.1) 1984 (81.8) 297 (12.2) 31 (1.3)