Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Risk Uncertain. 2020 Jul 24;60(3):229–258. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09330-9

Table 5.

Effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on smoking and vaping outcomes among adults using a two-way fixed effects model among adults ≥ 40 years: Combined BRFSS and NHIS data, 2011–2018

Outcome: Current traditional cigarette use Daily traditional cigarette use Current e-cigarette use Daily e-cigarette use Current dual use Current any use
Traditional cigarette tax rate −0.0046** [−0.0083,−0.0010] −0.0051*** [−0.0084,−0.0017] −0.0012 [−0.0041,0.0017] −0.0005 [−0.0024,0.0015] −0.0012 [−0.0034,0.0010] −0.0133*** [−0.0194,−0.0072]
E-cigarette tax rate 0.0022 [−0.0037,0.0081] 0.0017 [−0.0045,0.0080] 0.0028 [−0.0020,0.0077] 0.0013 [−0.0017,0.0044] 0.0032 [−0.0010,0.0074] 0.0150*** [0.0052,0.0248]
Observations 2,893,173 2,890,574 967,255 966,991 962,282 962,282
Proportion of outcome variable 0.143 0.105 0.023 0.008 0.014 0.147
Number of clusters 50 50 50 50 50 50

Notes: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. NHIS = National Health Interview Survey. Each column presents partial results from a single regression model. The unit of observation is an individual in a county in a year. Data are weighted to make the number of observations for each state, year, gender, race/ethnicity, and five-year age band cohort be proportionate to its national population share. Models are estimated with a linear probability model and control for locality-level and individual-level variables reported in Table 1, county fixed effects, and quarter-by-year fixed effects. 95% confidence intervals account for within-state correlations and are reported in square brackets.

***

= statistically different from zero at the 1% level

**

= statistically different from zero at the 5% level

*

= statistically different from zero at the 10% level