Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Risk Uncertain. 2020 Jul 24;60(3):229–258. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09330-9

Table 6.

Effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on smoking and vaping outcomes among adults using a two-way fixed effects model among women: Combined BRFSS and NHIS data, 2011–2018

Outcome: Current traditional cigarette use Daily traditional cigarette use Current e-cigarette use Daily e-cigarette use Current dual use Current any use
Traditional cigarette tax rate −0.0031 [−0.0074,0.0013] −0.0077*** [−0.0119,−0.0036] 0.0002 [−0.0045,0.0048] 0.0015* [−0.0002,0.0033] 0.0011 [−0.0031,0.0053] −0.0032 [−0.0117,0.0053]
E-cigarette tax rate 0.0004 [−0.0075,0.0083] 0.0064* [−0.0006,0.0135] −0.0023 [−0.0115,0.0068] −0.0038** [−0.0077,−0.00001 −0.0027 [−0.0106,0.0052] −0.0009 [−0.0143,0.0124]
Observations 2,173,324 2,171,782 710,064 709,875 706,693 706,693
Proportion of outcome variable 0.144 0.104 0.029 0.009 0.017 0.149
Number of clusters 50 50 50 50 50 50

Notes: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. NHIS = National Health Interview Survey. Each column presents partial results from a single regression model. The unit of observation is an individual in a county in a year. Data are weighted to make the number of observations for each state, year, gender, race/ethnicity, and five-year age band cohort be proportionate to its national population share. Models are estimated with a linear probability model and control for locality-level and individual-level variables reported in Table 1, county fixed effects, and quarter-by-year fixed effects. 95% confidence intervals account for within-state correlations and are reported in square brackets.

***

= statistically different from zero at the 1% level

**

= statistically different from zero at the 5% level

*

= statistically different from zero at the 10% level