Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Risk Uncertain. 2020 Jul 24;60(3):229–258. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09330-9

Table 7.

Effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on smoking and vaping outcomes among adults using a two-way fixed effects model among men: Combined BRFSS and NHIS data, 2011–2018

Outcome: Current traditional cigarette use Daily traditional cigarette use Current e-cigarette use Daily e-cigarette use Current dual use Current any use
Traditional cigarette tax rate 0.0005 [−0.0065,0.0076] −0.0046 [−0.0104,0.0012] 0.0044 [−0.0029,0.0117] 0.0015 [−0.0010,0.0041] 0.0050** [0.0010,0.0089] 0.0062 [−0.0098,0.0222]
E-cigarette tax rate −0.0067 [−0.0176,0.0043] 0.0054* [−0.0010,0.0118] −0.0081 [−0.0206,0.0044] 0.0007 [−0.0032,0.0045] −0.0062** [−0.0123,−0.0000] −0.0103 [−0.0388,0.0182]
Observations 1,587,777 1,586,242 560,437 560,172 557,824 557,824
Proportion of outcome variable 0.172 0.123 0.041 0.015 0.021 0.185
Number of clusters 50 50 50 50 50 50

Notes: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. NHIS = National Health Interview Survey. Each column presents partial results from a single regression model. The unit of observation is an individual in a county in a year. Data are weighted to make the number of observations for each state, year, gender, race/ethnicity, and five-year age band cohort be proportionate to its national population share. Models are estimated with a linear probability model and control for locality-level and individual-level variables reported in Table 1, county fixed effects, and quarter-by-year fixed effects. 95% confidence intervals account for within-state correlations and are reported in square brackets.

***

= statistically different from zero at the 1% level

**

= statistically different from zero at the 5% level

*

= statistically different from zero at the 10% level