Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;3(1):20200063. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20200063

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population and distribution of cancer type, the AI program’s delineation of lesions, lesion risk scores and radiologists’ assessments

Number n = 120 Excluded n = 39
Age, years
 Mean ± SD 62 ± 9 63 ± 9
 Median (range) 65 (44–74) 66 (44–74)
Cancer typea/ b IDC ILC IDC / ILC
 Number (%) 84 (70) 13 (11) 29 (74) / 2 (5)
Lesion delineationc Yes No
 Number (%) 100 (83) 20 (17)
 Overall malignancy risk score
  Mean ± SD 9,96 ± 0,32 7,35 ± 2,48
  Median (range) 10 (7–10) 8 (3–10)
Lesion risk score CC MLO
 Mean ± SD 74 ± 23 66 ± 24
 Median (range) 85 (27–95) 71 (25–95)
Radiologists’ assessmentsd Detected Missed Detected / Missed
 Number (%) 105 (88) 15 (13) 33 (85) / 6 (15)
 Overall malignancy risk score
  Mean ± SD 9,68 ± 1,22 8,47 ± 2,17
  Median (range) 10 (3–10) 10 (3–10)

AI, artificial intelligence.

a

IDC = invasive ductal cancer, ILC = invasive lobular cancer. Other cancer types: invasive tubular cancer (n = 3; 3%), invasive mucinous cancer (n = 1; 1%), invasive papillary cancer (n = 1; 1%), metastasis of non-breast primary cancer (n = 1; 1%) and unknown type (in situ n = 14; invasive n = 3; total n = 17, 14%).

b

Distribution of cancer types in the excluded group, in addition to IDC and ILC: invasive tubular cancer (n = 1; 3%), papillary cancer (n = 2; 5%) and unknown type (n = 5; 13%).

c

CC = cranio-caudal projection, MLO = medio-lateral-oblique projection. Missing data: 65 (54%) for CC and 62 (52%) for MLO.

d

Cancerous lesion detected by both radiologists versusvs missed by one radiologist.