Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;8(2):ofab010. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab010

Table 3.

Comparison of CrAg-Positive ART-Naïve and ART-Experienced PWH

` CrAg-Positive ART-Naïve (N = 123) CrAg-Positive ART-Experienced (n = 87) Total (n = 210)
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) P Valueb
Sex (n = 85)
 Female 26 (55.3) 25 (65.8) 51 (60.0) .327
 Male 21 (44.7) 13 (34.2) 34 (40.0)
Level of health facility
 Health center III 24 (19.5) 10 (11.5) 34 (16.2) <.001a
 Health center IV 83 (67.5) 20 (23.0) 103 (49.0)
 Hospital 16 (13.0) 57 (65.5) 73 (34.8)
District
 Kassanda 8 (6.5) 4 (4.6) 12 (5.7) <.001a,b
 Kiboga 16 (13.0) 12 (13.8) 28 (13.3)
 Kyankwanzi 1 (0.8) 3 (3.4) 4 (1.9)
 Luwero 52 (42.3) 10 (11.5) 62 (29.5)
 Mityana 16 (13.0) 28 (32.2) 44 (21.0)
 Mubende 8 (6.5) 15 (17.2) 23 (11.0)
 Nakaseke 11 (8.9) 14 (16.1) 25 (11.9)
 Nakasongola 11 (8.9) 1 (1.1) 12 (5.7)
Year
 2018 71 (57.7) 54 (62.1) 125 (59.5) .527
 2019 52 (42.3) 33 (37.9) 85 (40.5)

Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; PWH, people with HIV.

aStatistically significant result.

b P value from the Pearson chi-square test.

c P value from the Fisher exact test.