Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;8(2):ofab010. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab010

Table 4.

Comparison Between CrAg-Positive and CrAg-Negative PWH

Total Screened (n = 1721) CrAg-Negative (n = 1511) CrAg-Positive (n = 210)
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) P Valuea
Sex (n = 669) .523
 Female 380 (56.8) 329 (86.6) 51 (13.4)
 Male 289 (43.2) 255 (88.2) 34 (11.8)
Level of health facility
 Health center III 327 (19.0) 293 (89.6) 34 (10.4) .108
 Health center IV 899 (52.2) 796 (88.5) 103 (11.5)
 Hospital 495 (28.8) 422 (85.3) 73 (14.7)
District
 Kassanda 125 (7.3) 113 (90.4) 12 (9.6) .386
 Kiboga 184 (10.7) 156 (84.8) 28 (15.2)
 Kyankwanzi 46 (2.7 42 (91.3) 4 (8.7)
 Luwero 538 (31.3) 476 (88.5) 62 (11.5)
 Mityana 394 (22.9) 350 (88.8) 44 (11.2)
 Mubende 208 (12.1) 185 (88.9) 23 (11.1)
 Nakaseke 153 (8.9) 128 (83.7) 25 (16.3)
 Nakasongola 73 (4.2) 61 (83.6) 12 (16.4)
Year
 2018 967 (56.2) 842 (87.1) 125 (12.9) .298
 2019 754 (43.8) 669 (88.7) 85 (11.3)

Abbreviations: CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; PWH, people with HIV.

a P value from the Pearson chi-square test.