TABLE 3.
Best Overall Response to Platinum-based Therapies According to the Scheme, Tumor Differentiation, and for Well-Differentiated PanNET, Grade
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (n = 101) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Platinum/Etoposide | Platinum/Irinotecan | Platinum/Gemcitabine | Oxaliplatin/5-FU | Platinum | |||||||||||
Characteristic | PR (n = 16) |
SD (n = 20) |
POD (n = 21) |
PR (n = 3) |
SD (n = 4) |
POD (n = 2) |
PR (n = 6) |
SD (n = 8) |
POD (n = 3) |
PR (n = 5) |
SD (n = 9) |
POD (n = 1) |
PR (n = 1) |
SD (n = 1) |
POD (n = 1) |
Well-differentiated (PanNET), | 2/17 (12) |
8/17 (47) |
7/17 (41) |
0/5 (0) |
3/5 (60) |
2/5 (40) |
4/13 (31) |
6/13 (46) |
3/13 (23) |
4/13 (31) |
9/13 (69) |
0/13 (0/0) | 0/2 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
Grade 1 | 0/2 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
0/2 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
0/2 (0) |
0 /0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
Grade 2 | 1/6 (17) |
4/6 (67) |
1 /6 (17) |
0/2 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
1/6 (17) |
2/6 (33) |
3/6 (50) |
0/4 (0) |
4/4 (83) |
0/4 (17) |
0/1 (0) |
0/1 (0) |
1/1 (100) |
Grade 3 | 1/9 (11) |
3/9 (33) |
5/9 (56) |
0/3 (0) |
2/3 (67) |
1/3 (33) |
2/4 (50) |
2/4 (50) |
0/4 (0) |
3/7 (38) |
4/7 (62) |
0/7 (0) |
0/1 (0) |
1/1 (100) |
0/1 (0) |
Poorly differentiated (PanNEC) | 7/22 (32) |
8/22 (36) |
7/22 (32) |
3/4 (75) |
1/4 (25) |
0/4 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
0/2 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
1/1 (100) |
0/1 (0) |
0/1 (0) |
Unknown differentiation | 7/18 (39) |
4/18 (22) |
7/18 (39) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
1/2 (50) |
0/2 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
0/2 (0) |
1/2 (50) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
0/0 (0) |
Proportions and perentages are expressed in row.
PanNEN indicates pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm; PanNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; PanNEC, pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer; PR, partial response; SD, stability of disease; POD, progression of disease.