(A) Ad lib body weight before TRF paradigm. Unpaired t-test, t(11.92)=2.946, p=0.0123. (B) Dark-cycle food intake during TRF lead-in. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=10.74; p=0.0066 (main effect of TeTx). (C) Body weight during TRF lead-in expressed as a percentage of ad lib (pre-TRF) body weight in (B). Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=19.49; p=0.0008 (main effect of TeTx). (D) Two-hour binned continuous measures of respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. Shaded areas indicate dark cycle (ZT14–ZT24). (E) Mean L:D RER from D during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=6.878; p=0.0223 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=17.84; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (F) Mean 24-hr RER from E during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=9.973; p=0.0083 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=28.13; p=0.0002 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=9.062; p=0.0109 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=1.622; p=0.2445; TeTx t(12)=5.879; p=0.0001. (G) Two-hour binned continuous measures of heat production during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. (H) Mean L:D heat production from (G) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=2.486; p=0.1408 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=14.8; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (I) Mean 24-hr heat production from (H) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=2.559; p=0.1357 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=0.8136; p=0.3848 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=2.492; p=0.1404 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within-treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=1.754; p=0.1988; TeTx t(12)=0.4783; p=0.8711. (J) Two-hour binned continuous measures of locomotor activity (LMA) during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. (K) Mean L:D LMA from (J) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=27.83; p=0.00.0002 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=38.22; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (L) Mean 24-hr LMA from (K) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=27.83; p=0.0002 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=0.5965; p=0.4549 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=2.562; p=0.1354 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within-treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=0.5857; p=0.8142; TeTx t(12)=1.678; p=0.2242. Data are mean ± SEM. For repeated measures, post hoc, Sidak’s test at each time point is indicated on the graph. *p<0.05,**p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.