Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;10:e63671. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63671

Figure 4. DMHLepR neurons are required for adaptation to a dark-cycle restricted feeding schedule.

(A) Experimental timeline. Six weeks following bilateral microinjection of Cre-dependent GFP:TeTx (TeTx; n=7) or GFP control (control; n=7) to the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus (DMH) of LepR-Cre+ male mice, mice were acclimated to time-restricted feeding (TRF) in their home cages for a 5-day lead-in before transfer into direct calorimetry. TRF was maintained in calorimetry for an additional 4 days, followed by ad lib feeding. (B) Two-hour binned continuous measures of food intake during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. Shaded areas indicate dark cycle (ZT14–ZT24). (C) Mean L:D food intake from (B) under TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=5.084; p=0.0436 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=27.91; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (D) Mean 24-hr food intake from (C) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=5.097; p=0.0434 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=47.8; p<0.0001 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=19.58; p=0.0008 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=1.759; p=0.1971; TeTx t(12)=8.018; p<0.0001. Data are mean ± SEM.  For repeated measures, post hoc, Sidak’s test at each time point is indicated on the graph. *p<0.05,**p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 4—source data 1. Body weight, RER, EE, and LMA during TRF.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. TRF corrects phase shifts in RER, but has no effect on LMA.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Ad lib body weight before TRF paradigm. Unpaired t-test, t(11.92)=2.946, p=0.0123. (B) Dark-cycle food intake during TRF lead-in. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=10.74; p=0.0066 (main effect of TeTx). (C) Body weight during TRF lead-in expressed as a percentage of ad lib (pre-TRF) body weight in (B). Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=19.49; p=0.0008 (main effect of TeTx). (D) Two-hour binned continuous measures of respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. Shaded areas indicate dark cycle (ZT14–ZT24). (E) Mean L:D RER from D during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=6.878; p=0.0223 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=17.84; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (F) Mean 24-hr RER from E during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=9.973; p=0.0083 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=28.13; p=0.0002 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=9.062; p=0.0109 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=1.622; p=0.2445; TeTx t(12)=5.879; p=0.0001. (G) Two-hour binned continuous measures of heat production during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. (H) Mean L:D heat production from (G) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=2.486; p=0.1408 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=14.8; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (I) Mean 24-hr heat production from (H) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=2.559; p=0.1357 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=0.8136; p=0.3848 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=2.492; p=0.1404 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within-treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=1.754; p=0.1988; TeTx t(12)=0.4783; p=0.8711. (J) Two-hour binned continuous measures of locomotor activity (LMA) during TRF and transition back to ad lib feeding. (K) Mean L:D LMA from (J) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=27.83; p=0.00.0002 (main effect of TeTx); F(3,36)=38.22; p<0.0001 (time x TeTx interaction). (L) Mean 24-hr LMA from (K) during TRF and ad lib feeding. Two-way ANOVA: F(1,12)=27.83; p=0.0002 (main effect of TeTx); F(1,12)=0.5965; p=0.4549 (main effect of TRF); F(1,12)=2.562; p=0.1354 (TRF x TeTx interaction). Within-treatment comparison (TRF vs. ad lib): control t(12)=0.5857; p=0.8142; TeTx t(12)=1.678; p=0.2242. Data are mean ± SEM.  For repeated measures, post hoc, Sidak’s test at each time point is indicated on the graph. *p<0.05,**p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.