Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;63(3):317–330. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02517-6

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, false negative and false positive cases relative to baseline NCCT, visually evaluated colour-coded MTT, CBV and CBF maps generated by CT Perfusion 4D software, visually evaluated colour-coded Tmax and CBF maps generated by RAPID software (Tmax1 and CBF1, respectively), automatic quantitative Tmax and CBF parameters spotted in the RAPID software-generated colour perfusion mismatch map (Tmax2 and CBF2, respectively)

Parameters Sensitivity (CI at 95%) Specificity (CI at 95%) Accuracy (CI at 95%) False negative False positive
Baseline NCCT 29.6% (13/44) (16.8–45.2%) 100% (6/6) (54.1–100%) 38% (19/50) (25–52.7%)

31/44

70.4%

-
MTT (CT perfusion 4D) 88.6% (39/44) (75.4–96.2%) 50% (3/6) (11.8–88.2%) 84% (42/50) (70.3–92.8%)

5/44

11.4%

3/6

50%

CBV (CT perfusion 4D) 63.6% (28/44) (47.8–77.6%) 100% (6/6) (54.1–100%) 68% (34/50) (53.2–80.3%)

16/44

36.4%

-
CBF (CT perfusion 4D) 81.8% (36/44) (67.3–91.8%) 100% (6/6) (54.1–100%) 84% (42/50) (70.3–92.8%)

8/44

18.2%

-
Tmax1 (colour-coded rapid) 90.9% (40/44) (78.3–97.5%) 66.7% (4/6) (22.3–95.7%) 88% (44/50) (75–95.6%)

4/44

9.1%

2/6

33.3%

CBF1 (colour-coded rapid) 61.4% (27/44) (45.5–75.6%) 100% (6/6) (54.1–100%) 66% (33/50) (51.1–78.6%)

17/44

38.6%

-
Tmax2 (quantitative rapid) 65.9% (29/44) (50.1–79.5%) 100% (6/6) (54.1–100%) 70% (35/50) (55.2–81.9%)

11/44

25%

4/6

66.7%

CBF2 (quantitative Rapid) 6.8% (3/44) (1.4–18.7%) 100% (6/6) (54.1–100%) 18% (9/50) (9.1–31.5%)

41/44

93.2%

-

For each patient, follow-up CT or MRI was used as criterion standard. Confidence interval (CI) at 95%