Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;63(3):317–330. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02517-6

Table 3.

Comparison among CBF parameters and Tmax parameters evaluated in this study in terms of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy

Parameters CBF (colour-coded CT perfusion 4D) CBF1 (colour-coded rapid) CBF2 (quantitative RAPID) Statistical test
Sensitivity 81.8% (36/44) 61.4% (27/44) 6.8% (3/44) p < 0.001 (Q)
Specificity 100% (6/6) 100% (6/6) 100% (6/6) p > 0.05 (Q)
Diagnostic Accuracy 84% (42/50) 66% (33/50) 18% (9/50) p < 0.001 (Q)
Parameters Tmax1 (colour-coded rapid) Tmax2 (quantitative RAPID) Statistical test
Sensitivity 90.9% (40/44) 65.9% (29/44) 90.9% > 65.9%, p = 0.001 (M)
Specificity 69.7% (4/6) 100% (6/6) 69.7.9% < 100%, p = 0.5 (M)
Diagnostic Accuracy 88% (44/50) 70% (35/50) 88% > 70%, p = 0.0225 (M)

Q Cochran’s Q test, M McNemar exact test