Table 2.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted R2 | Adjusted R2 | Adjusted R2 | ||||
R2 = 0.664 | R2 = 0.642 | R2 = 0.200 | ||||
β | p | β | p | β | p | |
Age | 0.076 | 0.235 | 0.039 | 0.568 | 0.086 | 0.877 |
Sex | − 0.073 | 0.262 | − 0.079 | 0.211 | − 0.155 | 0.104 |
BMI | − 0.017 | 0.373 | 0.036 | 0.604 | 0.015 | 0.904 |
HbA1c | − 0.055 | 0.622 | − 0.037 | 0.559 | 0.012 | 0.909 |
UA | 0.034 | 0.807 | 0.1 | 0.123 | 0.099 | 0.342 |
Fasting IRI | 0.024 | 0.743 | 0.096 | 0.165 | 0.775 | < 0.001 |
HOMA-IR | − 0.019 | 0.785 | 0.047 | 0.468 | − 0.43 | 0.019 |
TG | 0.161 | 0.01 | – | – | 0.037 | 0.72 |
AST | 0.365 | 0.003 | 0.325 | 0.011 | – | – |
ALT | 0.465 | < 0.001 | 0.509 | < 0.001 | – | – |
Multiple regression analysis to determine factors independently associated with the plasma xanthine oxidase activity. Plasma xanthine oxidase activity was included as a dependent variable, and age, sex, body mass index, HbA1c, uric acid, fasting IRI and HOMA-IR were used as common explanatory variables.
We also included TG, AST and ALT as explanatory variables in model 1, AST and ALT in model 2, and TG in model 3.