Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;12:969. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21110-w

Table 2.

Cut-off values, and estimated sensitivity and specificity of RMOD resulting from ROC analysis performed using different reference methods (LM, PCR, RDT) and different infection characteristics.

Cut-off (mV/V)a Sensitivity (%)a Specificity (%)a κa,b
LM result
all LM positive 4.19 82 (78–86) 84 (81–86) 0.64
P. falciparum 4.00 79 (73–84) 83 (80–86) 0.57
P. vivax 5.15 87 (80–92) 88 (85–90) 0.63
P.f + P.v. (mixed) 10.20 95 (76–100) 96 (94–97) 0.55
PCR result
all PCR positive 3.54 78 (73–82) 78 (75–81) 0.54
P. falciparum 3.01 80 (74–85) 75 (71–78) 0.47
P. vivax 4.84 79 (71–86) 84 (81–87) 0.51
P.f.+P.v. (mixed) 5.40 80 (61–91) 85 (82–88) 0.24
RDT result
all RDT positive 4.11 76 (71–80) 83 (79–86) 0.58
PfHRP2 2.58 65 (52–77) 70 (66–73) 0.16
pLDH 5.14 81 (71–88) 87 (84–90) 0.55
PfHRP2+pLDH 4.11 81 (75–86) 83 (79–86) 0.57

aBold numbers are the means and numbers in parentheses are the 95% confidence intervals

bκ is the coefficient of agreement according to Landis and Koch43.