Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;12:991. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21270-9

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name 41467_2021_21270_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry Variation from standard conditions Yieldb (%)
1 No deviation >96 (96c)
2 Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 instead of Pd(PPh3)4 4
3 Pd(PPh3)2Cl2/XantPhos (1:2) instead of Pd(PPh3)4 7
4 Pd(PPh3)2Cl2/PPh3 (1:2) instead of Pd(PPh3)4 >96
5 with the addition of Xantphos or DPEPhos (10 mol %) as ligand 0, 8
6 t-BuBr instead of 2a 93d
7 CyI instead of 2a 87d,e
8 At 100 oC, in the absence of light irradiation 0
9 Without Pd(PPh3)4 or K2CO3 or light irradiation 0

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %), K2CO3 (0.2 mmol), and DMA [0.1 M] under 40 W blue LED irradiation with fan cooling (30 ± 5 °C).

bGC yields using dodecane as an internal standard, unless otherwise noted.

cIsolated yield. E:Z > 20:1.

dNMR yields using 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as an internal standard. E:Z > 20:1.

eYield of the cyclohexyl-substituted product.